AI Generated Pix/Video
posted 2 years ago
I agree that some definition should be made….
Maybe a new category for AI pics?
posted 2 years ago
I agree with you guys maybe there should be an AI watermark on those photos as personally I like to see real guys in tight spandex with all different shapes and sizes.
posted 2 years ago
In my opinion this site is mainly for real pictures, I still haven’t posted anything yet as I’m felling things out, but in my opinion ai stuff would be better placed in a personal blog or Twitter page not on a site designed for real life images, dating, and human to human interaction.
posted 2 years ago
i believe we shouldn't have AI photos or Video point blank period!!
AI is a dangerous precedence for a website like this, since its not a real photo of a real person as this website is a about meeting real people who are into Spandex,Lycra and similar kinks and fetishes.
Plus catfishing with photos do happen on here and this will only make it worse to discern whats real or fake.
Last edited: 2 years ago
posted 2 years ago
We're lucky that SP isn't flooded with AI generated pics. They still come up rarely and in most cases they are attributed as "AI generated".
That said, I think that posted pictures on profiles should still be in direct connection to the profile's owner. If someone uploads a picture of his favourite thong and singlet, then I'm fine with it. It tells me something about that user and I might connect with him because I'm also on the same page.
I've seen in the past months users uploading AI generated pics that had specific gear in specific poses, captioned with something like "my dream gear". It was one of many "real" pics in their profile. so I think this is fine.
BUT profiles that only have AI generated pics, with or without caption that it's AI generated, is problematic and should be set to private imho.
It reminds me of the question/rule of 'fully naked pics': as long as the member's profile is still about spandex, bulges and gear, I don't mind having a naked—or in this case AI generated pic with proper caption.
I know it's not a yes/no answer.
What do you think?
Edit: I messaged recent AI generated pics posters to align a little bit towards this handrule.
Last edited: 2 years ago
posted 2 years ago
posted by: spandexpartyadminWe're lucky that SP isn't flooded with AI generated pics. They still come up rarely and in most cases they are attributed as "AI generated". That said, I think that posted pictures on profiles should still be in direct connection to the profile's owner. If someone uploads a picture of his favourite thong and singlet, then I'm fine with it. It tells me something about that user and I might connect with him because I'm also on the same page. I've seen in the past months users uploading AI generated pics that had specific gear in specific poses, captioned with something like "my dream gear". It was one of many "real" pics in their profile. so I think this is fine. BUT profiles that only have AI generated pics, with or without caption that it's AI generated, is problematic and should be set to private imho. It reminds me of the question/rule of 'fully naked pics': as long as the member's profile is still about spandex, bulges and gear, I don't mind having a naked—or in this case AI generated pic with proper caption. I know it's not a yes/no answer. What do you think? Edit: I messaged recent AI generated pics posters to align a little bit towards this handrule.
posted 2 years ago
"We're lucky that SP isn't flooded with AI generated pics" oops, my bad. But i deleted them weeks ago. still not sure if/where/how to put them. there is still no forum attachment function.
posted 2 years ago
posted by: lycralustAU"We're lucky that SP isn't flooded with AI generated pics" oops, my bad. But i deleted them weeks ago. still not sure if/where/how to put them. there is still no forum attachment function.
posted 2 years ago
There are many other plateforms for IA-generated pics, already. Same for pin ups whose profiles only exist for the likes and with whom one can not interract... I think what makes SP stand out is that one is here not just to look at vids and pics, but also because one has a chance to chat and potentially (e)-meet with the person behind those posts. Keeping SP AI-free makes sense to me!
posted 2 years ago
posted by: jtalbot812Ive noticed something... Most of the guys who say they would rather see " REAL " people instead of a AI Generated pic, Don't have any Face pics of themselves... Why is that???? no offense but to me that seems very Hypocritical.
Last edited: 2 years ago
posted 2 years ago
posted by: jtalbot812Let’s not read into things that aren't there!! I never asked anyone to show a face. I only made a Mere observation.posted by: 8eight8Since when does showing your face determine if someone is real or AI? It might determine if you’re using somebody else’s pix as facial features can help, but there’s no 100% way online to know for sure. It’s down to the honor of the poster. Clear AI generation is a separate but related issue, IMO. Asking people to post face pix is a step too far into people’s privacy/personal preferences, especially considering being positively ID’d on a site like this could mean horrible things in some parts of the world.posted by: jtalbot812Ive noticed something... Most of the guys who say they would rather see " REAL " people instead of a AI Generated pic, Don't have any Face pics of themselves... Why is that???? no offense but to me that seems very Hypocritical.